For more than a year now, the financial press has been extolling the same statistic: All of the companies in the S&P 500 hold a collective $2 trillion in cash.
They didn't always stockpile cash. In the past, companies would look to spend their cash on acquisitions, as deal-making usually boosts top and bottom line results (i.e. revenues and profits). This is especially true during times of economic weakness -- like what we're currently experiencing.
Trouble is, corporate strategists are feeling uninspired these days, finding few potential deals that hold real appeal. In lieu of acquisitions, these companies are seeking two other ways to spend their cash: dividends and stock buybacks.
Yet as an investor, it's not clear which is the better move: Is it better to own a company about to issue dividends, or one that plans on buying back stock?
Let's take a look at the pros and cons of each scenario, starting with dividends.
Scenario #1: The Company Begins Issuing Dividends
The appeal of dividends lies in the production of income that investors receive. In a world of certificates of deposit (CDs) and government bonds that yield just 1% or 2%, dividend paying stocks that can pay a 3%, 5% or even 7% yield are highly-appreciated.
And many investors think that a robust dividend forces discipline on a company, making management focus on maintaining a steady cash flow that's returned to shareholders rather than using that cash for riskier moves -- like acquisitions -- that may not pay off.
The downside of dividends: double taxation. Unless you own the stock in a tax-favored retirement account, you'll pay the capital gains tax rate on those dividends (currently 15%, but possibly headed higher as part of a budget fix). That's after companies have already paid their share of taxes on profits (unless they are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) of Master Limited Partnerships (MLPS) which allow for a “pass-through” of profits).
Scenario #2: The Company Buys Back its Own Stock
Because dividend payouts can trigger unwanted capital gains taxes for an investor, many prefer to see the company announce share buybacks. When a company buys back stock, it reduces the number of shares outstanding, which boosts earnings per share (earnings divided by shares outstanding).
For example, Company ABC earns $100. If there are 10 shares outstanding, the company's earnings per share is $10 ($100/10 shares = $10/share). But if Company ABC buys back six shares, leaving only four shares outstanding, earnings per share suddenly increases to $25 ($100/4 shares = $25/share).
As you can see, when companies buy back stock, it increases each share's value. Sometimes the increased share value attracts new investors, further driving up prices.
[You can read about the powerful impact that buybacks have on stocks in this column.]
Yet stock buybacks have one glaring flaw: Companies sometimes buy back their stock at the wrong time -- usually when they thought their share prices were undervalued.
Telecom equipment company Nokia (NYSE: NOK) surely regrets spending more than $2.5 billion in 2007 to acquire more than 100 million shares of its stock, only to find that its stock would go on to plunge in value.
With its stock now trading at $6.60, that $2.5 billion buyback would have reduced the outstanding share count by 400 million at today's prices.
But there's another potential risk that shareholders should know about company buybacks: Many buybacks are really just covering up overly-generous stock option grants to employees and don't actually boost earnings per share (EPS).
Take acoustic engineering firm Dolby Corp. (NYSE: DLB) as an example. The company has been buying back stock for several years, yet due to numerous employee stock offerings, its share count keeps growing.
If there are more shares outstanding without an increase in EPS, this will cause the value of each share to drop. Lower share values could lead to a falling stock price, and leave shareholders worse off.
The company counters that its share count would have swelled far higher if the buybacks weren't enacted, but that may just be an excuse to keep shareholders calm.
The Investing Answer: As noted earlier, you should probably make your investment decisions based on what type of account the stock will be held in.
If you're invested in a company that has recently announced that it will begin issuing dividends, consider the tax consequences you may face. Right now, while capital gains tax rates are a reasonable 15%, it makes sense to own dividend-paying stocks in a traditional brokerage account, especially if you need the dividend income. If the tax rate on dividend income goes up in the coming years, as many suspect, then tax-sheltered retirement portfolios may be the better place for dividend-paying stocks to avoid the double-taxation factor.
If you're invested in a company that has recently announced that it will use its cash to buy back stock, pay attention to the outstanding share count of the company (found on the company's annual report on the company website). Companies focused on buybacks are suitable for taxable or retirement accounts, but you should be sure to monitor whether the share count is truly falling from quarter to quarter -- as this could affect the value of your shares in the company.
- Create a retirement savings goal
- Design an investment plan to reach it.
- Get a professional money manager to continually monitor and rebalance your portfolio
Sound complicated? Don't stress. Vanguard's new robo advisor service can help you put all of this (and more!) on autopilot, all for an annual gross advisory fee of just 0.20%.